
Categories
- A.G. Edwards (4)
- AARP (61)
- Accounting Fraud (15)
- Accounting Fraud (8)
- Affinity Fraud (60)
- Against Christians (19)
- Aging Parents (74)
- Alabama (3)
- Alabama (7)
- Alaska (1)
- Alaska (1)
- Alberta (5)
- Alberta (2)
- Allianz (1)
- Alternative Investments (2)
- Antigua (1)
- arbitration (1)
- Arizona (4)
- Arizona (9)
- Arkansas (1)
- Auction Rate Securities (1)
- Australia (12)
- Australia (10)
- Australia (6)
- Austria (1)
- Baby Boomers (165)
- Banc of America Securities LLC (2)
- Bear Stearns (1)
- Blank Check Companies (1)
- Boiler Rooms (16)
- bond risk (3)
- Brazil (1)
- British Columbia (2)
- British Columbia (1)
- California (132)
- California (84)
- Canada (16)
- Canada (6)
- Cayman Islands (1)
- CDs (8)
- CFTC (12)
- Charity Fraud (1)
- Charles Schwab & Co. (1)
- China (9)
- China (4)
- CitiGroup (1)
- Collateralized Debt Obligations (6)
- Colorado (36)
- Colorado (24)
- Commodities (15)
- Commonwealth Financial (1)
- Connecticut (10)
- Connecticut (5)
- Costa Rica (1)
- Credit Suisse (1)
- Currency Trading (21)
- Day Trading (2)
- District of Columbia (2)
- Edward Jones (1)
- Endowments (3)
- Endowments (1)
- Energy (3)
- ERISA (1)
- Estates (43)
- Fidelity (1)
- Financial Services Authority (6)
- FINRA (23)
- Firms (39)
- Florida (88)
- Florida (53)
- Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (5)
- Georgia (26)
- Georgia (15)
- Gold (5)
- Goldman Sachs (3)
- Green Energy (10)
- Hawaii (3)
- Hawaii (3)
- Healthcare (3)
- Hedge Funds (71)
- Hijacking (1)
- Idaho (8)
- Idaho (5)
- Illinois (35)
- Illinois (30)
- Indiana (8)
- Indiana (3)
- ING (1)
- Initial Public Offering (3)
- Insider Trading (32)
- Insurance Agents (8)
- Internet Loans (1)
- Investment Advisers (67)
- Investment Psychology (5)
- Investor Protection (618)
- Investors at Risk (600)
- Investors Capital Corp. (1)
- Iowa (4)
- Japan (3)
- JP Turner (1)
- Kansas (5)
- Kansas (3)
- Kay Securities (1)
- Kentucky (2)
- Kentucky (1)
- KMS Financial Services, Inc. (1)
- Lack of Supervision (9)
- Latvia (1)
- Legislation (4)
- Lehman Brothers (1)
- Life Settlements (5)
- Louisiana (3)
- Louisiana (3)
- LPL Financial (3)
- Maine (2)
- Market Manipulation (9)
- Maryland (7)
- Maryland (2)
- Massachesetts (5)
- Massachusetts (15)
- Merrill Lynch (8)
- MetLife Securities (1)
- Mexico (2)
- Michigan (26)
- Michigan (18)
- Minnesota (17)
- Minnesota (13)
- Mississippi (1)
- Missouri (8)
- Missouri (6)
- Montana (6)
- Montana (6)
- Morgan Stanley (9)
- Municipal Bonds (6)
- Nebraska (4)
- Netherlands (1)
- Nevada (14)
- Nevada (8)
- New Hampshire (5)
- New Hampshire (5)
- New Jersey (24)
- New Jersey (16)
- New Mexico (9)
- New Mexico (6)
- New York (75)
- New York (38)
- New Zealand (2)
- North Carolina (8)
- North Carolina (5)
- North Dakota (2)
- North Dakota (2)
- Ohio (20)
- Ohio (13)
- Oil and Gas (44)
- Oklahoma (4)
- Ontario (2)
- Oppenheimer (1)
- Options Trading (2)
- Oregon (6)
- Oregon (4)
- Organized Crime (3)
- Panama (1)
- Pennsylvania (17)
- Pennsylvania (13)
- Penny Stock (8)
- Pension Funds (14)
- Pension Funds (3)
- PIPEs (3)
- Poland (1)
- Ponzi schemes (574)
- Prime Bank Scams (37)
- PrimeVest Financial Services (1)
- Private Equity (3)
- Private Equity (2)
- private placement (3)
- Private Placement (1)
- Promissory Notes (39)
- Pruco Securities, Inc. (1)
- Prudential Securities, Inc. (1)
- Puerto Rico (1)
- Pump and Dump (39)
- Quebec (1)
- Quebec (1)
- Raymond James (1)
- Real Estate (30)
- Recently Divorced (43)
- Regions Bank (1)
- REITs (3)
- Retirees (164)
- Rhode Island (3)
- Rhode Island (2)
- Royal Alliance (1)
- Russian (6)
- Sales Practice Abuses (31)
- Sarbanes-Oxley (2)
- Scams (1096)
- Scandals (39)
- SEC (819)
- Securities Industry (general) (1100)
- Senior Citizens (190)
- Serious Fraud Office (10)
- South Africa (2)
- South Carolina (7)
- South Carolina (4)
- South Dakota (2)
- South Dakota (1)
- State Farm (1)
- State Street (1)
- Stifel Nicolaus & Co. (1)
- Tennessee (12)
- Tennessee (16)
- Texas (68)
- Texas (39)
- The Vigilant Investor (384)
- UBS Financial (8)
- Unauthorized Trading (6)
- Uncategorized (152)
- United Kingdom (30)
- United Kingdom (10)
- United Kingdom (17)
- Utah (22)
- Utah (18)
- Variable Annuities (13)
- Vermont (1)
- Viatical Settlements (2)
- Virginia (6)
- Virginia (8)
- Wachovia (2)
- Washington (14)
- Washington (9)
- Wells Fargo Securities Inc. (2)
- West Virginia (1)
- Wisconsin (5)
- Wisconsin (3)
- Wyoming (2)
- Wyoming (2)
Tags
ASIC
Australian Securities and Investments Commission
Bernard Madoff
Bernie Madoff
broker
Broker Snapshot
CFTC
Constant Patrol
dealer
due diligence
endowment
exchange
financial adviser
financial advisor
Financial Services Authority
FINRA
FOREX
fraud
hedge fund
Huddleston
Inc.
Insider Trading
investment adviser
investment advisor
Investors Watchdog
Investor’s Watchdog
Madoff
misappropriation
pension fund
Ponzi
prime bank
Private Equity
QualifEye
RCMP
RIA
Royal Canadian Mounted Police
scam
scheme
SEC
Securities and Exchange Commission
Serious Fraud Office
stockbroker
theft
The Vigilant Investor
Winnow
Blogroll
- Buck Naked Politics
- PatHuddleston.com
- The Harvard Law School Corporate Governance Blog
- The Huffington Post
- The Race to the Bottom













Don’t Trust the ‘Test Drive’
We’re looking at facts that are common to Ponzi schemes. No two are alike, but many share common characteristics.
Maybe you are a skeptic; you won’t believe something unless you see it with your own eyes. You may think that you are therefore immune from falling for financial scams. You’d be wrong. Scam artists know human nature and they [...]
We’re looking at facts that are common to Ponzi schemes. No two are alike, but many share common characteristics.
Maybe you are a skeptic; you won’t believe something unless you see it with your own eyes. You may think that you are therefore immune from falling for financial scams. You’d be wrong. Scam artists know human nature and they won’t pass a skeptic by if that skeptic has money. They’ll just pull out of their bag of tricks a technique tailor made for the hard core skeptic - the ‘test drive’. It works like this.
“You mean I can earn 10 percent per month in this investment?” you say. “I don’t’ believe it.” The scam artist is thrilled to hear it.
“Well,” says the scam artist. ”There are plenty of people clamoring to get into this thing, but I like you and don’t want you to lose this opportunity. So, I’ll tell you what. The minimum investment is $250,000. If I can find someone willing to put in just $225,000, I’ll ask the trader if I can pool those investments and get you in for $25,000 so that you can see how the program works.”
You have already started calculating how much you could make in an investment that pays 10% per month even if it works for just a few months. So you say, “OK.”
A few days go by and then the salesman calls up to say that he has found someone willing to invest $225,000 instead of the minimum $250,000. You give him a check for $25,000 and count the days off of the calendar. In thirty days you receive a check for $2,500. Thirty days later you receive another and another thirty days after that. And you are hooked. You’ve seen it with your own eyes - taken a test drive and liked the feel of the thing. You kick yourself for not putting in the $250,000 initially. You calculate the money you ‘lost’ by being cautious and ask the salesman whether you can jump in for the full $250,000.
“I’ll see if we’re still accepting subscriptions,” he says. “There is a maximum we can raise and I have to check to see whether we’ve reached it.” You pray that you are not too late.
Finally, the word comes back that the investment is almost fully subscribed but that you can just get in under the wire. You write the check for $250,000 and think about how lucky you are. You’ll likely get a check for $25,000 the first month. You may even blow it on an extravagance, sure that those checks will keep coming. You’ve seen it with your own eyes after all.
But have you?
The checks will soon stop coming. The salesman will have an excuse, and promise that the check will arrive soon. It might, but most likely not. You’ve been taken by a Ponzi scheme.
But what about the test drive? How could that work if the underlying profit generating machine was not legitimate? What you will eventually come to realize, probably from a Receiver appointed to clean up the mess, is that the $2,500 payments you received in the test drive were not profits, but your own money, or money stolen from someone else.
Do not believe your eyes. Instead believe the eyes of a former SEC Enforcement Branch Chief who will see things that you could not possibly see, and will notice omissions that you could never recognize.